otrava.net

Комментарии:

• 10/08/2025 - 05:05 Гость Tusk casino in South Africa a href=https://christinecrenee.com/ tusk promo code /a Tusk Casino Online has been available to South African users for a number of years. The company, which has been operating since 2020, offers a lucrative environment for betting on slot machines. After depositing, a player can play on one of several thousand slot machines. The brand offers lucrative bonuses, a user-friendly website and a dedicated mobile version for smartphones and tablets. https://christinecrenee.com/ tuskcasino What Tusk Casino offers Licence: Curacao eGamingB2C-82PETY-8W-1668JAZ; Payment methods: Skrill, Visa, Western Union, InstaDebit, Mastercard, Neteller, AstroPay, Boleto Bancario, Bitcoin, Neosurf, Litecoin, Ethereum, MuchBetter, eZeeWallet, Bank Wire; Mobile App: None; Casino games: Slots, jackpots, live casino, megaways, table games (roulette, cards); Game suppliers (game developers): 48 (Play’nGo, Fugaso, NetEnt, Booongo, Microgaming, PragmaticPlay, Wazdan, Amatic and others); VIP programme: Has; Minimum deposit: 25 ZAR; Minimum withdrawal: 1000 ZAR; Bonuses: Welcome Bonus, Refer A Friend, Weekly Cashback, Reload; Support (communication channels): Online chat, feedback form on website, [email protected]. Should you trust Tusk Casino? Before placing your bets, it is worth checking the information about the project. Tusk Casino is a modern resource with various reviews and feedback from experts. It is believed that the company offers favourable conditions for leisure gambling. In particular, the company has gained popularity thanks to its licence and quality certificates. All the software has undergone the necessary laboratory tests. By the way, much of Tusk Casino’s online functionality works without registration. In guest mode you can browse the catalogue, test the software in demo mode and view the information blocks. It is also easy to contact user support. Overall, the brand has an excellent reputation in the South African market. It continues to expand its services to Europe, Asia and other continents. What license does Tusk Casino Have? An essential element for a gambling club in any country is to hold a licence. This is the document that ensures it is safe to bet online at TuskCasino. The casino has been licensed by the prestigious Curacao Commission. The regulator can now provide players with support and legal assistance if needed. The company has also undergone several official software tests. The quality certificates and a validator can be found on the project’s website. Is it safe to place bets? One of the main advantages of the project is the total protection of personal data. When registering, users provide their personal information. It is clearly protected by modern encryption methods. At the same time, there is no doubt that the resource is regularly checked for viruses. The company is able to provide precautions for each user. The software provider for Tusk Casino Users choose this project for the opportunity to play quality slots. In particular, TaskCasino features such providers as NolimitCity, Amatic, GameArt, PragmaticPlay and others. They can be viewed together or separately thanks to the filters. In total, there are 48 different industry developers on the portal.
• 09/08/2025 - 09:30 Гость When President Donald Trump reopened a long-closed conversation about the name of the Washington NFL team, he and others implied that liberal thinking forced the venerable franchise to change its name from Redskins to Commanders in 2022. It wasn’t “wokeness” that led to that moment. It was capitalism. Corporate sponsors made the decision, not politicians or fans. On July 2, 2020, after the murder of George Floyd in late May and the resulting national conversation on race and racism, FedEx – the title sponsor of the team’s stadium at the time – called on the franchise to change its name. a href=https://tripskan.org трипскан вход /a Nike removed Redskins apparel from its website on the same day. The next day, the league and the organization announced that they were reviewing the team’s name. Soon, Amazon, Target and Walmart also removed Redskins merchandise from their stores and websites. At a time of heightened corporate sensitivity to racism, the franchise suddenly saw the possibility of millions of dollars in revenue being lost due to the Redskins name. After years of controversy, the organization’s then-leadership finally saw the financial writing on the wall and gave up a fight they had promised to wage forever. On July 13, the team announced it was retiring its name and logo and would go by the name Washington Football Team for the time being. Less than two years later, after a contest to rename the team, it became the Commanders. None of this came about quickly, or without a fight. This was a conversation, and a decision, years in the making. Protests occasionally popped up around Washington Redskins games in the 1990s and early part of the 21st century, but there was no evidence of a groundswell to change the name. https://tripskan.org tripskan In 2013, the National Congress of American Indians, representing 1.2 million people in its member tribes, announced that it opposed the moniker. The team consistently replied by saying it was honoring the achievements of Native Americans by keeping the name. As evidence, then-team president Bruce Allen said that three high schools with a majority Native American student body used the name. The team and its supporters mentioned a 2004 poll by the Annenberg Public Policy Center that found that a majority of Native Americans were not offended by the name. Then again, the use of public polling methods to measure a small, diverse population also came into question and was criticized by experts. More than a decade ago, Sports Illustrated’s Peter King led the way, as did a few other sports journalists, including myself, publicly stating that we would no longer use the name – a name that each of us had said thousands of times in our careers covering the NFL. “Try explaining and defending the nickname to a child,” I wrote in 2013. “It’s impossible.” Back then, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell was still defending the team’s name, but he said in radio interviews that he wanted to “listen” on the issue. “We’ll always listen, and we’ll always be open,” he said on ESPN Radio August 1, 2013, when asked to compare his defense of the Washington team name with his comments on Philadelphia Eagle Riley Cooper’s racist slur at the time, which were anything but a defense: “Obviously wrong … insensitive and unacceptable,” Goodell said of Cooper’s language. Goodell went farther a month later while speaking to a Washington radio station: “Ultimately it is Dan (Snyder’s) decision, but it is something I want all of us to go out and make sure we are listening to our fans, listening to people that have a different view, and making sure we continue to do what is right. We want to make sure the team represents the strong tradition and history that it has for so many years. … If we are offending one person we need to be listening and making sure we are doing the right things to address that.”
• 06/08/2025 - 03:11 Гость Job losses But what about the impact of tariffs on job creation? Surprisingly, an increase in import taxes has been found to result in slightly more unemployment across countries. a href=https://kra35c.cc Площадка кракен /a An example provided by Irwin at Dartmouth College points to one plausible explanation — and it has to do with the steeper cost of imported goods. “A number of studies have shown, on net, we lost jobs from the (2018) steel tariffs rather than gained jobs because there are more people employed in the downstream user industries than in the steel industry itself,” he said. https://kra35c.cc kra34.cc A study by the Federal Reserve Board found that a rise in input costs resulting from US tariff hikes in 2018-19 led to job losses in American manufacturing. The damage from those higher expenses was compounded by retaliatory taxes on US exports, more than offsetting a small boost to manufacturing employment from US tariffs — at least so far, the 2024 paper said. Retaliation by other countries is indeed another danger of pulling the tariff lever. Higher tariffs on American exports would typically raise their prices for foreign consumers, hitting demand for the goods in many cases. When Trump announced new tariffs this year, America’s major trading partners were quick to strike back with their own levies, although the US then agreed a temporary truce with China and the European Union. Costs of free trade While economists generally agree that free trade has benefited the global economy in recent decades, they acknowledge that it comes with certain costs. One is the loss of jobs in communities that are particularly exposed to new competition from foreign manufacturers. That is similar to the impact of technological progress on workers. “Manufacturing jobs as a share of the labor force have come down everywhere. It isn’t a US-specific story,” said Gimber at JPMorgan Asset Management, pointing to automation. He drew a parallel between helping workers affected by higher imports and what is known as a just transition — the idea that the drastic changes needed to move toward a greener economy should be fair to everyone and minimize harm to workers and communities. In both cases, providing workers in impacted industries with new skills or retraining them could be key, Gimber said. Another potential cost of free trade is dependency on far-flung manufacturers. That took on new relevance during the pandemic, which snarled global supply chains, contributing to shortages of products such as face masks and respirators in the US and elsewhere. However, economists do not typically see tariffs as a good way to build up domestic manufacturing, Fatas at INSEAD said, noting that subsidies for specific industries are viewed as a better tool “because they work more directly.” But perhaps the strongest argument in favor of free trade is its importance to maintaining peace between nations. As Gimber’s colleague David Kelly noted in March, closer trade relations give countries more to lose in any conflict.

 
• назад
• 75
• 76
• 77
• 78
• 79
• 80
• 81
• 82
• 83
• 84
• 85
• 86
• 87
• дальше